Documenti
Una piattaforma on line risultato dell’attività di raccolta, analisi e archiviazione di documenti aggiornati sul Public Engagement, al fine di avviare una riflessione condivisa sulle definizioni, le azioni e i benefici del Public Engagement
Scopri l’ultima versione del Barometro APEnet, lo strumento di auto-valutazione per il monitoraggio del Public Engagement
Filtra per
Casi studio
10/07/2024
Barometro APEnet 2022
Uno strumento condiviso di auto-valutazione che facilita il monitoraggio continuo del Public Engagement e apre al confronto e allo scambio di buone pratiche Report
Definizioni e riflessioni sul PE
16/09/2020
Developing a framework for responsible innovation
The governance of emerging science and innovation is a major challenge for contemporary democracies. In this paper we present a framework for understanding and supporting efforts aimed at ‘responsible innovation’. The framework was developed in part through work with one of the first major research projects in the controversial area of geoengineering, funded by the UK Research Councils. We describe this case study, and how this became a location to articulate and explore four integrated dimensions of responsible innovation: anticipation, reflexivity, inclusion and responsiveness. Although the framework for responsible innovation was designed for use by the UK Research Councils and the scientific communities they support, we argue that it has more general application and relevance Articolo
Definizioni e riflessioni sul PE
16/09/2020
Responsible research and innovation: From science in societyto science for society, with society
The term responsible (research and) innovation has gained increasing EU policy relevance in the last two years, in particular within the European Commission’s Science in Society programme, in the context of the Horizon 2020 Strategy. The paper provides a brief historical overview of the concept, and identify three distinct features that are emerging from associated discourses. The first is an emphasis on the democratic governance of the purposes of research and innovation and their orientation towards the ‘right impacts’. The second is responsiveness, emphasising the integration and institutionalisation of established approaches of anticipation, reflection and deliberation in and around research and innovation, influencing the direction of these and associated policy. The third concerns the framing of responsibility itself in the context of research and innovation as collective activities with uncertain and unpredictable consequences. Finally, the authors reflect on possible motivations for responsible innovation itself Articolo
Definizioni e riflessioni sul PE
16/09/2020
Engaged scholarship. The Politics of Engagement and Disengagement
This book was motivated by a desire to contribute to in-depth, critical discussions about engaged scholarship and education. Recognizing that, although some theorizing is underway, much of the published literature on community-engaged scholarship focuses on practice-based stories and pragmatic concerns relating to encouraging, supporting, rewarding and institutionalizing engagement in a variety of educational settings, we sought to shift the discourse and create space for a more broad discussion. Volume